How They Erased Israel’s Color: Black Presence in Scripture and History

If you only learned the Bible from:

Children’s picture books

Western movies

European art

you probably saw:

Light-skinned “Israelites”

European-looking prophets

A very European-looking “Jesus”

But Scripture moves through Africa and the Afro-Asian world over and over.

The issue:

They didn’t just hide prophecy.

They also washed out the people.

Africa and the Bible: Hiding in Plain Sight

Look at just a few clear threads:

Mitsrayim (Egypt) – A major power in Scripture, in Africa, not Europe.

Cush/Ethiopia – Referenced repeatedly as a real nation with real people.

The Ethiopian official in Acts 8 – A high-ranking African reading the prophet Yesha’yahu (Isaiah), baptized into the faith.

Israel’s time in Egypt – Centuries in an African land, interwoven with African power and geography.

These aren’t side notes. Africa is part of the main storyline.

Skin, Region, and Reality

We’re not playing the game of:

“Every person in the Bible was dark-skinned just like this or that group today.”

But we are saying:

These events happened in North Africa and West Asia, not Northern Europe.

It is historically dishonest to act like everyone looked like Renaissance paintings.

Ancient descriptions of nearby peoples show a range of brown tones, including very dark.

When They painted everyone light, it wasn’t accuracy—it was cultural centering.

Why Erasing Color Helped Empire

When Rome and later European powers:

Made themselves the center of “Christian civilization”

Exported their art, icons, and theology around the world

a light, European “holy family” served to:

Place Europe closer to “divine image” in people’s imaginations

Make colonized and enslaved people see themselves as further from the sacred

Justify the idea that power and “civilization” naturally belonged to the pale

If the people of Scripture are always pictured as looking like the colonizer, that sends a message—even without a sermon.

Black Presence in Early Faith History

Beyond Scripture:

There were early African believers in places like Alexandria, Carthage, and Ethiopia.

African regions played major roles in preserving texts, thought, and communities.

Some early theologians and leaders were from African soil and bloodlines.

But Western teaching often skips:

Africa’s role

Non-European leadership

The complexity of color in the early ekklesia

So people are left thinking:

“The Bible was white, church history was white, and we just showed up later.”

That’s not truth. That’s selective storytelling.

Where to Study This Yourself

You can start digging with:

General resources on “Africa and the Bible” – look for historians who trace Cush, Egypt, and Ethiopia in Scripture.

Studies on the Ethiopian eunuch (Acts 8) and early Ethiopian Christianity.

Historical work on North African Christianity (Alexandria, Carthage, early African theologians).

Articles and books examining how European art shaped the racial imagination of Christianity.

Search terms that help:

“Africa in the Bible historical studies”

“Ethiopian Christianity early church history”

“North African church fathers history”

“Depictions of biblical figures in Western art and race”

Compare different historians and perspectives; don’t lock into one voice.

Final Call

The goal is not to replace one supremacy with another. The goal is to tell the truth:

Scripture moved across Black and Brown lands.

Many of YAHUAH’s people did not look like European paintings.

You were never less in His image because of your melanin.

When you recover this, you don’t just win an argument—you recover dignity and context.

Let the Bible speak from its own soil, not from the studio lights of empire.

How They Erased Israel’s Color: Black Presence in Scripture and History